PeopleRating
● Reviewed by real people, not by a language model

Which version wins? Ask people, not your group chat.

Put two versions of your cover, logo, packaging, ad or app screen in front of real people. Within hours you know which one wins β€” and, more useful, why it wins.

Free to start: review three pieces of work, get three responses on yours.

Two ways to get answers

Both land in the same place: honest, written responses from people who actually looked.

TRADE

Review three, receive three

Every response you write earns a turn. Every submission you open spends three, and opens three places for others. No subscription, no credits to buy.

PAY

Set your own reward

In a hurry, or after a specific audience? Describe who you need, set a reward per response, and people who match get the request in their account.

Coming after launch.

ALWAYS

Answers you can act on

Reviewers are rated on whether they were specific and whether you can do something with it β€” never on whether they were nice.

The five questions

The same five for every comparison. They ask what someone did and saw, which is exactly what a language model cannot make up.

  1. Which one would you pick?
  2. Why? (at least 80 characters)
  3. What did you think it was, before you read anything?
  4. What did you look at first?
  5. How confident are you? (1–5)

What people bring

πŸ“•Book coversThumbnail test included
πŸ”·LogosBefore the rebrand goes live
πŸ“¦PackagingShelf-glance decisions
πŸ“·Product photosWhich one sells
πŸ“£AdsHook or scroll past
πŸ“±App screensFirst-glance clarity
✍️CopyHeadlines, blurbs, bios
🎧Anything visualTwo versions, one question

Get in early

We are opening in small groups, because the exchange only works if there is work waiting to be reviewed. Two questions, both of which change what we build.

Free text on purpose β€” we read every one of these by hand.

One email when we open your group. Nothing else, ever. You must be 18 or over to take part.